Skip to content
Sports

eFG% Calculator - Effective Field Goal Percentage

Enter the number of two-point field goals made, three-point field goals made, and total field goal attempts to get the effective field goal percentage. eFG% adjusts for the extra value of three-pointers so you can compare shooters fairly, regardless of shot mix. Results update instantly as you type, with a full breakdown of individual shooting lines and an efficiency rating against NBA benchmarks.

Your details

Number of two-point field goals made (drives, mid-range, post shots).
Total two-point field goal attempts. Must be >= makes.
Number of three-point field goals made.
Total three-point field goal attempts. Must be >= makes.
Used only to compute True Shooting % (TS%) alongside eFG%.
Total free throw attempts. Used only to compute TS%.
Effective Field Goal %Very Good
0.6%

Shooting efficiency adjusted for the extra value of three-pointers

Standard FG%0.5%
2-Point FG%0.5%
3-Point FG%0.4%
True Shooting %0.6%
Total Points Scored31
Total Field Goals Made12
Total Field Goal Attempts25
0.6% %
Poor<0.42Below Avg0.42-0.46League Average0.46-0.5Very Good0.5-0.55Excellent0.55+
03060050100
3-Point Attempt Rate (%)
  • eFG%
  • FG%

eFG% of 56.0% is very good efficiency.

  • Standard FG% is 48.0%; eFG% is 56.0% , a difference of 8.0 percentage points from weighting the three-pointers.
  • 40% of field goal attempts were three-pointers, which boosted the eFG%.
  • True Shooting % is 57.9%, which also accounts for free-throw scoring efficiency.
  • Points per field goal attempt: 1.24, a practical measure of shot value.

Next stepThis is efficient shooting. Maintain shot quality by prioritising high-percentage spots and avoiding unnecessary mid-range volume.

What is Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%)?

Effective Field Goal Percentage is a shooting efficiency metric that corrects a well-known flaw in standard field goal percentage: a three-pointer is worth 50% more points than a two-pointer, yet both count as one make. eFG% fixes this by crediting each three-pointer as 1.5 makes instead of 1, so you can directly compare a player who attacks the rim constantly with one who lives behind the arc. The result is a single number that tells you how efficiently a player or team converts field goal attempts into points, regardless of shot mix.

eFG% vs Standard FG%: why the difference matters

Two players can shoot identical 45% from the field yet have very different offensive value. If Player A takes all two-pointers, those 45% makes produce 0.90 points per attempt. If Player B converts the same 45% on three-pointers only, they produce 1.35 points per attempt, 50% more per shot. Standard FG% treats them identically; eFG% shows Player B at 67.5%, correctly rating them as far more efficient. This gap widens in the modern game, where coaches actively encourage corner threes (one of the highest-value shots in basketball) over contested mid-range attempts.

eFG% vs True Shooting % (TS%): which should you use?

eFG% and True Shooting % measure efficiency at different levels. eFG% covers only field goal attempts, making it ideal for evaluating pure shooting on field goal shots or comparing shooters when free-throw volume is similar. TS% extends the formula further by incorporating free throws (using a 0.44 multiplier on free-throw attempts to estimate the shooting possessions they consume), giving a fuller picture of a player who draws contact and converts at the line. Use eFG% for shot-quality analysis; use TS% when comparing players with markedly different free-throw rates.

How to interpret your result

The NBA league-average eFG% typically sits between 53% and 55% in recent seasons, driven upward by the ongoing shift toward three-point shooting. Centers and power forwards who score close to the basket routinely post 60%+ eFG% on two-point attempts; three-point specialists add value by converting at 40%+ from deep (40% on threes equals the scoring output of 60% on twos). A result below 46% usually signals poor shot selection, specifically too many long two-point attempts, or making a low percentage of shots across all zones. The interactive chart on this page lets you explore how shifting your three-point attempt rate would change your eFG% while keeping your per-type shooting percentages constant.

eFG% Benchmarks (NBA context)

eFG%RatingContext
60%+ Excellent Elite rim finishers, high-volume corner 3 specialists
55-59% Very Good All-star calibre efficiency, efficient three-point shooting
50-54% Above Average Solid contributor; above the league mean
46-49% League Average Typical NBA rotation player
42-45% Below Average Shot selection may need improvement
Below 42% Poor Inefficient; high volume of contested or long-two attempts

General NBA benchmarks based on historical league averages. Centers tend to score higher due to high-percentage two-point attempts near the rim; perimeter players compensate by converting three-pointers.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good eFG% in basketball?

In the NBA, anything above 55% is considered very good and above 60% is elite. The league average typically falls in the 53-55% range. For college and recreational basketball the benchmarks are similar in structure but raw percentages can vary. As a rule of thumb, above 50% is above average, 46-50% is roughly average, and below 42% signals poor shooting efficiency.

What is the eFG% formula?

eFG% = (Field Goals Made + 0.5 x Three-Point Field Goals Made) / Field Goal Attempts. You can also write this as: (2-point makes + 1.5 x 3-point makes) / total attempts, since the 0.5 multiplier on all makes and the extra 1.0 on three-point makes is equivalent. Multiply the result by 100 to express it as a percentage.

Why is there a 0.5 multiplier on three-pointers?

A three-pointer scores 50% more points than a two-pointer (3 vs 2). To make one makes equal to 1.5 two-point equivalent makes, the formula adds half a bonus make for each three-pointer scored. That one adjustment is all it takes to put shooters with different shot mixes on the same scale.

Can eFG% exceed 100%?

In theory, yes. A player who attempted only three-pointers and converted every single one would have an eFG% of 150%. In practice this never happens at meaningful shot volumes, but it is a documented edge case noted on Wikipedia. Standard FG% is capped at 100% by definition; eFG% is not.

Does eFG% account for free throws?

No, eFG% is calculated from field goal attempts only and ignores free throws entirely. If you want to factor in free-throw efficiency, use True Shooting % (TS%) instead, which uses the formula: TS% = Points / (2 x (FGA + 0.44 x FTA)). This calculator computes TS% for you when you enter free-throw data.

How is eFG% used in NBA team analysis?

At the team level, eFG% is one of the "Four Factors" identified by analyst Dean Oliver as the key drivers of winning: shooting efficiency (eFG%), turnovers, offensive rebounding, and free-throw rate. Teams with a higher eFG% than their opponent win the vast majority of games, making it one of the most predictive single-game statistics available.

Sources

Written by Dr. Marcus Bennett, DPT, CSCS Exercise Physiologist · London, UK

Exercise physiologist and strength specialist bridging laboratory science with practical training application for athletes and active adults.

Search 3,500+ calculators

Loading search…