Target Heart Rate Calculator
Enter your age and resting heart rate to get personal training zones using the Karvonen heart-rate-reserve method. Choose from four max-HR formulas including the women-specific Gulati formula, enter a tested maximum, and see full zone ranges with RPE and talk-test guidance for every band.
Formula
Worked example
Age 30, resting 65 bpm, Haskell formula: max = 220 - 30 = 190; reserve = 190 - 65 = 125; aerobic zone (70-80%) = 125 x 0.70 + 65 = 152 bpm to 125 x 0.80 + 65 = 165 bpm.
The Karvonen method and why resting heart rate matters
The top target heart rate calculators default to the Karvonen, or heart-rate-reserve, method rather than a flat percentage of maximum. It works in two steps: first, your heart rate reserve is your maximum heart rate minus your resting heart rate; then each training target is that reserve multiplied by an intensity percentage and added back to your resting rate. Because a fitter person usually has a lower resting heart rate and therefore a larger reserve, this approach produces personalized zones that a plain percent-of-max calculation cannot match. That is why resting heart rate is a primary input here, not an afterthought. Skipping it causes the calculator to fall back to plain percent-of-max, which runs several beats lower in easy zones and may underestimate your actual training targets.
Choosing a max HR formula: Haskell, Tanaka, HUNT, or Gulati
This calculator offers four age-based formulas plus the option to enter a tested maximum. The familiar 220 - age rule (Haskell) is convenient and widely cited, but it carries a standard deviation of roughly 10 to 12 beats per minute and tends to overestimate younger adults while underestimating older ones. The Tanaka formula, 208 - 0.7 x age, was validated across a broad population in a 2001 meta-analysis and generally tracks measured maximums more closely, especially past middle age. The HUNT formula, 211 - 0.64 x age, comes from a large Norwegian population study and is another solid general choice. For women, the Gulati formula, 206 - 0.88 x age, was specifically derived from a study of female subjects and outperforms 220 - age in that group. Best of all, if you have a genuinely tested maximum from an all-out effort or a supervised exercise test, enter it directly so every zone is built on your real ceiling.
How to read the zones: RPE, the talk test, and zone distribution
Zones 1 and 2 build aerobic base and aid recovery; at these intensities you can hold a comfortable conversation (the "talk test"). Zone 3 develops aerobic capacity; conversation takes effort. Zone 4 sharpens lactate threshold and running economy; you can manage only single words. Zone 5 is maximal effort for short bursts only; speech is not possible. The Borg RPE (Rating of Perceived Exertion) scale from 6 to 20 maps roughly as: zone 1 feels like 9-11, zone 2 like 12-13, zone 3 like 14-15, zone 4 like 16-17, and zone 5 like 18-20. A common training distribution for endurance athletes is the "80/20" or polarized model: roughly 80% of sessions in zones 1 and 2, and 20% in zones 4 and 5, with little time in zone 3. Beginners may spend more time in zones 2 and 3 while building base fitness.
Fitness classification from resting heart rate
Your resting heart rate, measured first thing in the morning before getting out of bed, is a useful proxy for cardiovascular fitness. A resting rate below 50 bpm is typical of endurance athletes; 50-59 bpm is excellent for most adults; 60-69 bpm is good; 70-79 bpm is average; 80-99 bpm is below average; and 100 bpm or above may warrant a conversation with a physician, as it can indicate stress, dehydration, illness, or an underlying condition. A consistently lower resting rate after several weeks of training is a reliable sign that your aerobic fitness is improving. The Karvonen zones reflect this: a lower resting rate gives a larger reserve and shifts all zone boundaries upward, meaning you have to work harder to reach the same intensity as before.
External factors that affect heart rate accuracy
Heart rate can be elevated by caffeine, heat, humidity, altitude, dehydration, stress, illness, sleep deprivation, and some medications. On days when any of these apply, your heart rate will run higher than usual at the same actual effort, so the talk test and perceived exertion are more reliable guides than the number on your monitor alone. Chest-strap heart rate monitors are more accurate than wrist-based optical sensors, especially during high-intensity intervals where wrist motion creates noise. For zone training to work well, aim to measure resting heart rate under consistent conditions and use a reliable sensor.
Heart-rate training zones and RPE guidance
| Zone | % intensity | Effort | Talk test | RPE (6-20) | Trains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, Warm-up | 50-60% | Very light | Full sentences easily | 9-11 | Recovery, easy base |
| 2, Fat burn | 60-70% | Light | Comfortable conversation | 12-13 | Endurance, fat oxidation |
| 3, Aerobic | 70-80% | Moderate | Short phrases, some effort | 14-15 | Aerobic capacity |
| 4, Threshold | 80-90% | Hard | Single words only | 16-17 | Lactate threshold, speed |
| 5, Maximal | 90-100% | Maximal | Cannot speak | 18-20 | Peak power (short bursts) |
Intensity bands, what each zone trains, the talk test, and the Borg RPE score. With a resting heart rate entered, percentages apply to your reserve (Karvonen); without one, they apply to your max.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Karvonen formula?
The Karvonen formula sets a target heart rate using your heart rate reserve, which is your maximum heart rate minus your resting heart rate. The target equals reserve multiplied by an intensity percentage, plus your resting heart rate. For example, at age 30 with a resting rate of 65 bpm and a max of 190 bpm, the reserve is 125 bpm; a 70% aerobic target is 125 x 0.70 + 65 = about 152 bpm. Adding the resting rate back is what makes the method personal.
How is Karvonen different from a plain percent of max?
A plain percent-of-max calculation just multiplies your maximum heart rate by an intensity, so a 70% zone at a max of 190 bpm is 133 bpm. Karvonen instead applies the percentage to your reserve and adds your resting rate back, giving roughly 152 bpm for the same person. The two methods agree only at 100% intensity; everywhere below that, Karvonen targets run higher and more accurately reflect your individual fitness level.
Which max HR formula should I use?
If you are a woman, the Gulati formula (206 - 0.88 x age) is likely the most accurate age-based option. For most adults, the Tanaka formula (208 - 0.7 x age) or the HUNT formula (211 - 0.64 x age) tends to outperform the classic 220 - age rule, especially over age 40. If you have ever recorded a true maximum during an all-out effort or supervised stress test, use that tested value instead of any formula.
What is a healthy resting heart rate?
For most adults, a resting heart rate between 60 and 80 bpm is considered normal. Athletes who train regularly often see resting rates of 40 to 60 bpm. A rate below 40 bpm in a non-athlete, or consistently above 100 bpm (called resting tachycardia), warrants a discussion with a physician. A downward trend in your resting rate over weeks of consistent training is a reliable sign that your cardiovascular fitness is improving.
What is the 80/20 or polarized training model?
The polarized (80/20) model divides training so that roughly 80% of sessions fall in zones 1 and 2 (easy, conversational effort) and about 20% in zones 4 and 5 (hard, near-maximal). Little time is spent in zone 3 (moderate tempo effort). Research with endurance athletes suggests that this distribution, avoiding the "moderate intensity rut," produces better aerobic adaptations than spending most time in a medium-hard zone.
What is heart rate reserve?
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is simply your maximum heart rate minus your resting heart rate. It represents the functional range your heart can work within during exercise. A larger reserve generally indicates better cardiovascular fitness. The Karvonen formula uses this reserve as the basis for all zone calculations, which is why two people with the same age and max HR but different resting rates end up with different zone targets.
Sources
- American Heart Association, Target Heart Rates Chart
- Tanaka, Monahan, Seals (2001), Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited (JACC)
- Gulati et al. (2010), Heart rate response to exercise stress testing in asymptomatic women (Circulation)
- Nes et al. (2013), Age-predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects (Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports)